<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exasperated Calculator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com</link>
	<description>What's so bad about being rational?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Trekathon will return</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/11/the-trekathon-will-return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/11/the-trekathon-will-return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 11, 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 11, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/11/the-trekathon-will-return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC Build 3: The Buildening</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/07/pc-build-3-the-buildening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/07/pc-build-3-the-buildening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flightsim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since one of my more popular posts on how to build a small media PC, and even longer since I built my last &#8216;main&#8217; PC (2008). But due to age, and a growing addiction to FlightSim, I decided to build a whole new PC. Here are all the bits (well, minus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since one of my more popular posts on how to build a small media PC, and even longer since I built my last &#8216;main&#8217; PC (2008).</p>

<p>But due to age, and a growing addiction to FlightSim, I decided to build a whole new PC.</p>

<p>Here are all the bits (well, minus the motherboard that hadn&#8217;t arrived when I took this photo):</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5965678787" title="View 'PC Build 2011: The Parts' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="PC Build 2011: The Parts" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6132/5965678787_f0f1d93395.jpg" height="276"/></a></p>

<p>I&#8217;ll talk about the various bits as I put things together. Everything except for the motherboard was purchased at <a href="http://msy.com.au/">MSY</a>, who have great prices and a Canberra store front. The motherboard came from <a href="http://www.auspcmarket.com.au/">Aus PC Market</a>, another fantastic supplier of bits, especially stuff that&#8217;s a bit more bleeding edge.</p>

<p>First up, here&#8217;s the case fully disassembled, with all the cables running everywhere:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966236422" title="View '20110722-DSC_3236' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3236" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6138/5966236422_914fb133c2.jpg" height="443"/></a></p>

<p>The case is an Antec Nine Hundred Two V3, which is probably a bit more garish than I&#8217;d like, but was a good price and a good size. I would have preferred a P182 or P183, but no one had those in stock at reasonable prices. Here&#8217;s the case cleaned up and ready to start building:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5965679799" title="View '20110722-DSC_3238' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3238" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6147/5965679799_98f0144bec.jpg" height="419"/></a></p>

<p>First up is installing the motherboard I/O plate. The motherboard here is an ASRock Z68 Extreme 4. This is probably the most &#8216;bleeding edge&#8217; component I&#8217;ve ever bought &#8211; Z68 motherboards have only been available since May! We can see on the I/O port a few of the important features &#8211; HDMI out on the onboard video card, USB 3.0 ports, FireWire, 5.1 sound and so on.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966236964" title="View '20110722-DSC_3240' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3240" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6124/5966236964_ebe002c3b8.jpg" height="499"/></a></p>

<p>Next, the power supply. This time around I have a Thermaltake 875W power supply &#8211; slight overkill for what will be in it at first, but I wanted to be able to add another video card later on, if needed.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966237488" title="View '20110722-DSC_3242' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3242" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6027/5966237488_48101ae8c7.jpg" height="418"/></a></p>

<p>Another first for me, this is a modular power supply, meaning that you plug in only those cables that you need. This is a huge help in keeping the inside of the case reasonably neat.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966238064" title="View '20110722-DSC_3244' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3244" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6015/5966238064_2a7fb435a2.jpg" height="391"/></a></p>

<p>Here&#8217;s the motherboard, ready for component install. Another first for me, I&#8217;m using an aftermarket cooler, in this case the Coolermaster Hyper 212+, which is rated as one of the best of the low end coolers. It&#8217;s about 5 times the size of the stock Intel one, so it at least made installing a lot harder!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966239346" title="View '20110722-DSC_3246' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3246" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6150/5966239346_3d64c8b0d0.jpg" height="425"/></a></p>

<p>The processor is an Intel i7 2600K, about the best balance between cost and performance available at the medium to high end at the moment. This is the &#8216;K&#8217; variant, so it&#8217;ll be easier to over clock later.</p>

<p>Here we see everything installed on the motherboard ready to go. The memory is G.Skill Ripjaws, and is 8gb of DDR3-2133. Probably the place in the computer where I went furthest up-market, but RAM speed helps a lot, especially in flight sim.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5966238650" title="View '20110722-DSC_3249' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110722-DSC_3249" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6020/5966238650_4600433f64.jpg" height="408"/></a></p>

<p>So now proceeds an hour or so of swearing at drive bays, coaxing drives into place and so forth, to arrive at this:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5965683897" title="View '20110722-DSC_3253' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="395" alt="20110722-DSC_3253" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6007/5965683897_2e346d4f05.jpg" height="500"/></a></p>

<p>There are three drives installed here. There&#8217;s an LG Blu-Ray drive, purchased only because Blu-Ray adds very little to the cost these days. The main boot drive is a 64gb Kingston SSD, to speed up boot and operating system performance. The main storage drive is a Western Digital Caviar Black 7200rpm 1tb drive.</p>

<p>A bit of cable dressing, and putting the covers back on and we have this:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5965684451" title="View '20110722-DSC_3256' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="473" alt="20110722-DSC_3256" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6141/5965684451_69c647864c.jpg" height="500"/></a></p>

<p>All ready for the next stage, putting on the software. This is a PC for flight sim, so the only choice is really Windows. In this case, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit.</p>

<p>Finally, here&#8217;s everything in place in my home office/cockpit:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5965685163" title="View '20110723-DSC_3258' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110723-DSC_3258" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6005/5965685163_1fcf7ae0e6.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>The other components for the build are a Microsoft wireless mouse and keyboard set, and an LG 27&#8243; monitor. The flight sim controls are all from my old PC, relegated to the far right of the desk now.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s working very well so far, giving me 45.0 frames per second on FSXMark11, a pretty respectable performance for a sub $2,000 PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/07/pc-build-3-the-buildening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sous Vide: Week One</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-week-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-week-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cooking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, to start with I want to quickly go over my Sous Vide setup. The bits I&#8217;ve bought are a Maxkon Vacuum Sealer. It&#8217;s a no-name brand, but it works well and the bags to use with it are reasonably cheap. The main special part is the temperature controller. This bit turns the rice cooker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, to start with I want to quickly go over my Sous Vide setup.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5626704393" title="View 'Sous vide setup' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Sous vide setup" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5264/5626704393_3ae5379fe2.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>The bits I&#8217;ve bought are a Maxkon Vacuum Sealer. It&#8217;s a no-name brand, but it works well and the bags to use with it are reasonably cheap.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5627289834" title="View 'Vacuum sealer' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Vacuum sealer" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5226/5627289834_07a059e44a.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>The main special part is the temperature controller. This bit turns the rice cooker on and off according to the temperature in the water bath.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5627290778" title="View 'Temperature controller' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Temperature controller" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5266/5627290778_98f860f612.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>And finally, the rice cooker. This one was from Big-W for $40, and had a few useful accessories like racks/et. I&#8217;d really like a bigger one, but haven&#8217;t found one yet.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5627291506" title="View 'Rice Cooker' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Rice Cooker" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5627291506_518900d602.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Using it is very simple. You plug the rice cooker into the back of the temperature controller, and put the temperature sensor into the water bath.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5626708489" title="View 'Temperature sensor' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Temperature sensor" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5185/5626708489_a01ce60880.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Then you just have to set the temperature, and the little box does the rest of the work.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5627293792" title="View 'Turning temperature control on' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="Turning temperature control on" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5029/5627293792_6b5c2c2c25.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>So now, onto the cooking reports. This week I&#8217;ve tried:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>Sous Vide Brownies &#8211; a bit of a failure, but I think because I didn&#8217;t cream the butter properly.</p></li>
<li><p>Sous Vide Steak &#8211; very nice, but I took too long browning it and it was a little cold by the time it hit the plate (this seems to be a bit of a structural problem to me: by only cooking to the exactly right temperature, the meat will hold the heat for less time).</p></li>
<li><p>Sous Vide Pork Fillet &#8211; this worked much better, and produced one of the nicest pieces of pork I&#8217;ve had in a while. It could&#8217;ve done with a little seasoning before being vacuum sealed, I think, but it worked pretty well.</p></li>
<li><p>Sous Vide Kebabs. This was the most experimental I&#8217;ve been. I just took some of the kebabs we normally buy from the Griffith Butcher, and cut the pointy end off the kebab, sealed it, and cooked for two hours at 60 degrees, followed by a very quick run on a very hot skillet. Definitely juicier and more tender than usual, but probably needed a bit more browning.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>Next up is a Sous Vide Eye Fillet. Yum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-week-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sous Vide: Day One</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-day-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-day-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cooking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many have noticed, I&#8217;m a bit of a gadget hound. Today&#8217;s new entry &#8211; a Sous Vide setup. I&#8217;d been wanting to try Sous Vide (french for &#8216;Under Vacuum&#8217;) for a while, but the multi-thousand dollar costs of the setups put me off. Then I found Sous Vide at Home. It&#8217;s a simple box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many have noticed, I&#8217;m a bit of a gadget hound.</p>

<p>Today&#8217;s new entry &#8211; a Sous Vide setup. I&#8217;d been wanting to try Sous Vide (french for &#8216;Under Vacuum&#8217;) for a while, but the multi-thousand dollar costs of the setups put me off.</p>

<p>Then I found <a href="http://www.sousvideathome.com.au">Sous Vide at Home</a>. It&#8217;s a simple box that you plug in to a rice cooker, and it uses a combination of a temperature sensor and turning the rice cooker on and off to maintain a constant temperature in the water bath. Together with a vacuum sealer to seal the meat in the total cost was less than $300.</p>

<p>Today&#8217;s first experiment was a simple one &#8211; a soft boiled egg.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s take a brief excursion into the science of cooking first.</p>

<p>Cooking is not mainly about heating things up. It&#8217;s about chemical reactions. The two biggies in this case are protein denaturation and the malliard reaction.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction">malliard reaction</a> is what happens when food browns as you grill or bake it. It&#8217;s really important for a lot of flavours. And it happens at around 154 degrees C, which is why grills and ovens need to be at least this temperature when cooking meat. But we can add this later (e.g., with a blowtorch). We&#8217;ll be coming back to this one tomorrow.</p>

<p>Protein denaturation, on the other hand, happens at much lower temperatures. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denaturation_(biochemistry)">Denaturation</a> is when proteins lose some of their structure due to external stress, in this case heat.</p>

<p>The clever bit comes in the fact that different proteins in food denature at different temperatures, and so by careful temperature control we can create tastes that are otherwise practically impossible.</p>

<p>So let&#8217;s come back to eggs.</p>

<p>Eggs are composed of lots of different proteins. So for every temperature form around 57 degrees C (which is effectively uncooked) through to 90 degrees C (Egg yolk becomes crumbly) we get a slightly different result. The most interesting results are in the range from 62 to 70 degrees.</p>

<p>So to start: one egg, in shell, cooked at 65 degrees for one hour. Another point to note about Sous Vide is that it&#8217;s kinda slow: but the good news is that you don&#8217;t need to hang around while it cooks. For many things, such as meat, it doesn&#8217;t matter if you leave it in for several extra hours. Eggs are a bit twitchier though.</p>

<p>The result: A runny, slightly set egg white, and a firm but gel-like yolk. A cross between a hard boiled and soft boiled egg really. And with a really interesting taste.</p>

<p>Anyway, day two will see some pictures of the whole setup, plus my first attempt at cooking some meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/sous-vide-day-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To: Take photographs during a balloon ride</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/how-to-take-photographs-during-a-balloon-ride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/how-to-take-photographs-during-a-balloon-ride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you book a balloon ride you may (like me) think that you don&#8217;t need to think too much about taking pictures: &#8220;f/8 and be there&#8221; would be all you need. What you haven&#8217;t realised (or perhaps you did, and that&#8217;s why you&#8217;re here) is that the lighting conditions are going to be really difficult. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you book a balloon ride you may (like me) think that you don&#8217;t need to think too much about taking pictures: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number#Effects_on_image_quality">&#8220;f/8 and be there&#8221;</a> would be all you need.</p>

<p>What you haven&#8217;t realised (or perhaps you did, and that&#8217;s why you&#8217;re here) is that the lighting conditions are going to be really difficult. Balloon flights nearly always occur at dawn, due to the weather conditions (particularly wind). But dawn is a really tricky time to take photographs.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s what I did on a recent flight, it seemed to work pretty well.</p>

<p>Before the flight: choose your equipment. I cut back to two lenses &#8211; an 18-55 for wide-angle shots, and a 70-300 for telephoto. A polarising filter would have been a good addition, but I don&#8217;t have one of those.</p>

<p>Next, before the flight setup: I knew that I&#8217;d need pretty fine control, so I set my camera for full manual mode. I also checked the other settings, such as for the cursed &#8216;bracket&#8217; mode &#8211; I have taken so many almost good photos ruined by forgetting to turn bracketing off.</p>

<p>Getting there: my flight started 30 minutes or so before dawn with the setup for the balloon. It was effectively dark at this point &#8211; I was shooting 18mm f/4.5 1/60&#8243; ISO 6400 and getting photos that only had material in the far end of the histogram. That&#8217;s pretty much the extreme of my camera in terms of low-light.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395725974" title="View '20110128-DSC_1154' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1154" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5011/5395725974_96a70c5fde.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Once dawn twilight started I began cranking my camera down. As I was on an 18mm I wasn&#8217;t getting too much depth-of-field problems from shooting at f/4.5, and with vibration reduction 1/60&#8243; is fine for hand shake. So I took the improving light on the ISO to start with, cranking the ISO down whenever the picture started going past halfway on the histogram. This is purely a personal taste question, about the tradeoff between underexposure and noise, but I really dislike noise. Another reason to keep the picture a bit underexposed is to get better pictures of the flame from the burners heating the air</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395831848" title="View '20110128-DSC_1213' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1213" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5395831848_f0d63d04d6.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>The balloon inflating is a good subject, and you can need to move quickly as it inflates quite rapidly once it gets going. I stayed on the wide angle throughout &#8211; the details weren&#8217;t that interesting, and the best shots I could see were including the most of the balloon.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395252483" title="View '20110128-DSC_1229' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="332" alt="20110128-DSC_1229" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/5395252483_5f904d85a5.jpg" height="500"/></a></p>

<p>After a quick scramble in for take-off we were away. I was still on f/4.5 and 1/60&#8243;, but now on ISO 200. The light is still improving, and as I was at my camera&#8217;s best ISO (it can do ISO 100, but you lose dynamic range) I was now slowly increasing the f/stop. While the depth of field on my 18-55mm lens is unlikely to cause any depth-of-field problems, the 70-300 is likely to have some problems unless it&#8217;s past f/11 or so, although it also needs a 1/125&#8243; minimum handheld exposure.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395268697" title="View '20110128-DSC_1242' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1242" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5051/5395268697_0741f3f5fd.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Once moving it&#8217;s a slower experience. Try a range of different options as the balloon moves, and you&#8217;ll find you have plenty of time to try several variations on one subject.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395331991" title="View '20110128-DSC_1302' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1302" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5295/5395331991_fb45b42b93.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Not too far into the balloon ride I found that the light had gotten better enough for me to start to worry less about it, so I switched over to aperture priority, and also started to play with my long lens for close ups of some of the things in the lake. I probably started a bit early, as the f-stop was still giving me depth of field problems with that lens.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395376101" title="View '20110128-DSC_1354' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1354" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5295/5395376101_ae9dd9e153.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Don&#8217;t forget to keep your eye out down as well as around &#8211; there were some rowers on the lake who made a very good subject on the day of our balloon ride.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60784457@N00/5395987916" title="View '20110128-DSC_1370' on Flickr.com"><img border="0" width="500" alt="20110128-DSC_1370" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5258/5395987916_d829b15894.jpg" height="332"/></a></p>

<p>Soon enough it was time for landing. To get one more interesting shot in, I set my camera to high speed, and took a sequence of photos as the balloon landed. Which, of course, I then turned into a time lapse video:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/28RuOxMKlWQ?hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/28RuOxMKlWQ?hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>And that&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/04/how-to-take-photographs-during-a-balloon-ride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/01/2172/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/01/2172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog-ministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/01/2172/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first, and most important thing to know about 2011 is that it&#8217;s a prime number. Why is this important? Because it suggests that it will be a year unique in it&#8217;s own right, not just derivative of other years. I hope so at least. In a lot of ways 2010 did not go very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first, and most important thing to know about 2011 is that it&#8217;s a prime number.</p>

<p>Why is this important? Because it suggests that it will be a year unique in it&#8217;s own right, not just derivative of other years.</p>

<p>I hope so at least. In a lot of ways 2010 did not go very well at all. I don&#8217;t want to dwell on the past, just want to make the most of a new year.</p>

<p>I have only one resolution for the year: control. Be in control, don&#8217;t cede control to circumstances, or even the desire to sleep <img src='http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>

<p>Hopefully that&#8217;ll mean more blogging here as well, starting with the return of the Trekathon, and probably some nerdy stuff about writing iPhone apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2011/01/2172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, yeah&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/11/so-yeah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/11/so-yeah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog-ministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more observant of you will have noticed that the Trekathon stalled a little bit back in June at the end of TNG Season 6 and DS9 Season 1. There are a lot of different reasons, which I won&#8217;t go in to. And looking forward I have a big holiday coming up, and next year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more observant of you will have noticed that the Trekathon stalled a little bit back in June at the end of TNG Season 6 and DS9 Season 1.</p>

<p>There are a lot of different reasons, which I won&#8217;t go in to.</p>

<p>And looking forward I have a big holiday coming up, and next year I&#8217;m going to be studying part time. So the &#8216;free&#8217; time for Star Trek has been eaten up.</p>

<p>So, here&#8217;s the new plan. The new Star Trek movie comes out on 29 June 2012. That&#8217;s 601 days from now. As I had 457 episodes to go, that means that I need to watch a bit less than one episode a day. So early in 2011 I&#8217;ll be getting back on the wagon at a lower pace.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll probably be doing some other posts on the blog from time to time as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/11/so-yeah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon Season Review: The Next Generation, Season 6</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-the-next-generation-season-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-the-next-generation-season-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Season six feels like a year where the writers were willing to take chances. And while there are some failures (Aquiel, anyone?), when it works it really works. Another trend of this year was a move away from ensemble episodes and more towards single-character focused episodes. So we have episodes like Frame of Mind or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Season six feels like a year where the writers were willing to take chances. And while there are some failures (<em>Aquiel</em>, anyone?), when it works it really works.</p>

<p>Another trend of this year was a move away from ensemble episodes and more towards single-character focused episodes. So we have episodes like <em>Frame of Mind</em> or <em>Birthright, Part II</em> that barely have any of the other crew members outside of the focus character. That&#8217;s probably an artefact of the contract negotiations for people on a show as long-lived and popular as this one, but it makes for a nice change of pace.</p>

<p>Overall it&#8217;s the strongest year of TNG so far, and hence the strongest year of any of the series. Out of the 26 episodes I had 14 down as &#8216;excellent&#8217; or &#8216;very good&#8217;, and only 1 as &#8216;very bad&#8217;. Even Season 3, the previous best, only had 7 in the top half, although it did manage to avoid the &#8216;very bad&#8217; category.</p>

<p>That brings the rankings so far to:</p>

<ul>
<li>TNG Season 6</li>
<li>TNG Season 3</li>
<li>TNG Season 5</li>
<li>TOS Season 2</li>
<li>TNG Season 4</li>
<li>TOS Season 1</li>
<li>DS9 Season 1</li>
<li>TNG Season 2</li>
<li>TAS Season 1</li>
<li>TOS Season 3</li>
<li>TAS Season 2</li>
<li>TNG Season 1</li>
</ul>

<p>That&#8217;s 280 watched, 12,609 minutes down, 38.67% complete. 45,665 words written. And 457 to go. Next, the final year of TNG, and the sophomore year for DS9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-the-next-generation-season-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 280: Descent (TNG)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-280-descent-tng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-280-descent-tng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The traditional end-of-year cliffhanger brings back both the Borg and Lore. The usual &#8216;two-parter&#8217; syndrome is not as evident as usual here, thanks to the plot thread involving Data and his investigation of emotions. The other strength is the callback to I, Borg, and the long overdue examination of Picard&#8217;s actions there. But there&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traditional end-of-year cliffhanger brings back both the Borg and Lore.</p>

<p>The usual &#8216;two-parter&#8217; syndrome is not as evident as usual here, thanks to the plot thread involving Data and his investigation of emotions. The other strength is the callback to <em>I, Borg</em>, and the long overdue examination of Picard&#8217;s actions there.</p>

<p>But there&#8217;s a severe case of &#8216;enemy decay syndrome&#8217; happening with the Borg here &#8211; maybe it&#8217;ll be explained, but the crew are able to deal with large numbers of Borg without the problems they&#8217;ve previously faced dealing with only one. It&#8217;s always hard to deal with near-invulnerable enemies, but it doesn&#8217;t help if you just weaken them.</p>

<p>I liked this episode, but I&#8217;ve forgotten what happens in Part 2, and I could very easily end up changing my mind based on how this is resolved. A lot has been set up, but so far there hasn&#8217;t been a single season-opening resolution to the cliffhanger that has lived up to Part 1.</p>

<p>280 down, 457 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-280-descent-tng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon Season Review: Deep Space Nine, Season 1</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-deep-space-nine-season-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-deep-space-nine-season-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far it&#8217;s fair to say that Deep Space Nine has a lot of promise, but so far has only showed a couple of attempts to really grasp it. The thing this season has done really well is avoid awful. There were really only two &#8216;bad&#8217; episodes (The Passenger and If Wishes Were Horses). That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far it&#8217;s fair to say that Deep Space Nine has a lot of promise, but so far has only showed a couple of attempts to really grasp it.</p>

<p>The thing this season has done really well is avoid awful. There were really only two &#8216;bad&#8217; episodes (<em>The Passenger</em> and <em>If Wishes Were Horses</em>). That&#8217;s impressive for a new show, when a lot can go wrong with early episodes. But that&#8217;s been done by avoiding risks, and the vast majority of the season was &#8216;ok&#8217;, not &#8216;good&#8217; or &#8216;great&#8217;.</p>

<p>But there are still signs of great potential, especially with the episode <em>Duet</em>, which is an example of taking risks, and of taking the show in a direction that TNG doesn&#8217;t.</p>

<p>Overall it was a strong first season &#8211; not quite enough to edge ahead of season 1 of the original series, but very very close.</p>

<p>That brings the rankings so far to:</p>

<ul>
<li>TNG Season 3</li>
<li>TNG Season 5</li>
<li>TOS Season 2</li>
<li>TNG Season 4</li>
<li>TOS Season 1</li>
<li>DS9 Season 1</li>
<li>TNG Season 2</li>
<li>TAS Season 1</li>
<li>TOS Season 3</li>
<li>TAS Season 2</li>
<li>TNG Season 1</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-season-review-deep-space-nine-season-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 279: In the Hands of the Prophets (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-279-in-the-hands-of-the-prophets-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-279-in-the-hands-of-the-prophets-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first season comes to an end with a bang. Sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist. Anyway, in the tradition of the best episodes of this season, once again the focus is on Bajoran politics. This time the religious angle is at the fore, and the underlying differences between Bajor and the Federation are the main thing. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first season comes to an end with a bang.</p>

<p>Sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>

<p>Anyway, in the tradition of the best episodes of this season, once again the focus is on Bajoran politics. This time the religious angle is at the fore, and the underlying differences between Bajor and the Federation are the main thing. The setup is a little too obviously a &#8216;ripped from the headlines&#8217; Star Trek take on the debates over the teaching of evolution, and that struck me as being a little too overtly political for Star Trek&#8217;s normal approach.</p>

<p>The political part of the episode aside, the procedural investigation side rolls along nicely, and the personal touch in having O&#8217;Briens assistant (seen in the previous episode as well) as the assassin. It&#8217;s a strong season finale, but a lot rests on whether the threads begun here are carried through or dropped.</p>

<p>279 down, 458 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-279-in-the-hands-of-the-prophets-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 278: Timescape (TNG)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-278-timescape-tng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-278-timescape-tng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another trip to the time travel well, fortunately with something new to offer. This episode is very reminiscent of Cause and Effect, but given that was one of the best episodes ever that&#8217;s not the worst base to build off. There&#8217;s a new direction taken here, and the episode ends up standing well on its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another trip to the time travel well, fortunately with something new to offer.</p>

<p>This episode is very reminiscent of <em>Cause and Effect</em>, but given that was one of the best episodes ever that&#8217;s not the worst base to build off. There&#8217;s a new direction taken here, and the episode ends up standing well on its own. Perhaps there&#8217;s a bit too much plot, and not quite enough character, but it&#8217;s still an entertaining hour of television.</p>

<p>This episode is an example of &#8216;good&#8217; technobabble. Any science fiction show is going to have its share of incomprehensible technologies. When it&#8217;s good, it&#8217;s used to create interesting situations with clear rules that allow the audience to follow what&#8217;s being done. The bad sort is when it&#8217;s used to justify a quick fix at the end of the episode, acting as a deus ex machina to get the writer out of the hole they&#8217;ve dug. Too often Star Trek does the latter, so it&#8217;s important to remember that the other sort of technobabble isn&#8217;t a problem per se.</p>

<p>278 down, 459 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-278-timescape-tng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 277: Duet (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-277-duet-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-277-duet-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took the best part of a season, but Deep Space 9 now officially has an episode to rival the best of Next Generation. The greatest strength of this episode is that it draws almost solely on the setting on Bajor, and outside of that is barely science fiction. It&#8217;s a bold, courageous approach to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took the best part of a season, but Deep Space 9 now officially has an episode to rival the best of Next Generation.</p>

<p>The greatest strength of this episode is that it draws almost solely on the setting on Bajor, and outside of that is barely science fiction. It&#8217;s a bold, courageous approach to take, and could very easily have worked out very badly. It succeeds brilliantly, mainly thanks to the performances of Nana Visitor as Kira and Harris Yulin as Marritza.</p>

<p>Another important reason why the episode works so well is that the plot manages to avoid a lot of the cliches or recurrent plots around the ideas of captured war criminals &#8211; there&#8217;s a genuinely new approach here, and it makes for excellent viewing.</p>

<p>277 down, 460 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-277-duet-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 276: Dramatis Personae (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-276-dramatis-personae-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-276-dramatis-personae-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for DS9 to take another run at the &#8216;possessed by alien energy&#8217; plot. This one works a lot better than The Passenger, but that&#8217;s not a hard bar to clear. There are some nice bits and pieces &#8211; Sisko as the disengaged yet vicious leader was nice. It was also a nice touch that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for DS9 to take another run at the &#8216;possessed by alien energy&#8217; plot. This one works a lot better than <em>The Passenger</em>, but that&#8217;s not a hard bar to clear.</p>

<p>There are some nice bits and pieces &#8211; Sisko as the disengaged yet vicious leader was nice. It was also a nice touch that the aliens were just twisting reactions and events, rather than replacing people&#8217;s memories wholesale. But it developed out of hand a bit too quickly, with Kira skipping from &#8216;annoyed&#8217; to &#8216;assassinate the Commander&#8217; too quickly to be believable even with the aliens.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m normally pretty easy to please in terms of suspending disbelief, but the ending with the alien energy sucked out of them and then sucked out into space? That was a bit too much even for me. For once, I think I&#8217;d have preferred the technobabble.</p>

<p>276 down, 461 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-276-dramatis-personae-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 275: Second Chances (TNG)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-275-second-chances-tng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-275-second-chances-tng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most interesting transporter malfunction so far. In a call back to the TOS episode The Enemy Within, Riker is duplicated in a transporter accident. Only this time it&#8217;s not an evil twin. It&#8217;s a refreshing take on the older idea, and my only quibble is the lack of trauma in &#8216;Thomas&#8217; Riker. He&#8217;s been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most interesting transporter malfunction so far. In a call back to the TOS episode <em>The Enemy Within</em>, Riker is duplicated in a transporter accident. Only this time it&#8217;s not an evil twin.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s a refreshing take on the older idea, and my only quibble is the lack of trauma in &#8216;Thomas&#8217; Riker. He&#8217;s been trapped, alone, in this isolated base for eight years. But he doesn&#8217;t seem traumatised at all by it &#8211; in fact, you get the impression that the existence of the other Riker is the only thing causing him trauma. Frakes does a reasonable job in separating the two Rikers, but I think it would have been helped if he had a bit more to work with in the script.</p>

<p>275 down, 462 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-275-second-chances-tng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 274: The Forsaken (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-274-the-forsaken-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-274-the-forsaken-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear, it&#8217;s Lwaxana Troi. Despite that handicap, I liked quite a bit here. O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s relationship with the computer seemed quite real to me &#8211; I&#8217;ve had similar thoughts about some of the computers that I&#8217;ve worked with. And while Lwaxana&#8217;s normal predatory approach was annoying, we learnt quite a bit about Odo that made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, it&#8217;s Lwaxana Troi.</p>

<p>Despite that handicap, I liked quite a bit here. O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s relationship with the computer seemed quite real to me &#8211; I&#8217;ve had similar thoughts about some of the computers that I&#8217;ve worked with. And while Lwaxana&#8217;s normal predatory approach was annoying, we learnt quite a bit about Odo that made his character seem much more rounded.</p>

<p>And is it just me, or did Lwaxana actually look a lot better without the wig?</p>

<p>In the end I found myself enjoying this one, as even the silly subplot with Bashir and the ambassadors worked quite well.</p>

<p>274 down, 463 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-274-the-forsaken-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 273: Rightful Heir (TNG)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-273-rightful-heir-tng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-273-rightful-heir-tng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y&#8217;know, if I was Gowron I&#8217;d just go in the other direction whenever I saw Worf &#8211; he always seems to be caught in the middle of complicated difficulties for the Klingon Empire. This time around he&#8217;s rewriting the Klingon constitution by reforming it into a constitutional monarchy. It&#8217;s a good episode, driven by Worf&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, if I was Gowron I&#8217;d just go in the other direction whenever I saw Worf &#8211; he always seems to be caught in the middle of complicated difficulties for the Klingon Empire.</p>

<p>This time around he&#8217;s rewriting the Klingon constitution by reforming it into a constitutional monarchy. It&#8217;s a good episode, driven by Worf&#8217;s doubts and inner journey. It manages to transcend the somewhat silly premise of cloning an original Klingon hero.</p>

<p>As an aside, it&#8217;s interesting that we&#8217;ve now had almost a dozen episodes focused on Klingon politics, and really only one about those of the Federation. As a result we know far more about the Klingons, which seems odd.</p>

<p>273 down, 464 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-273-rightful-heir-tng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 272: If Wishes Were Horses (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-272-if-wishes-were-horses-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-272-if-wishes-were-horses-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good teaser should make you eager to see the rest of the episode. If, even with my project to watch everything, I very nearly turned the episode off after the teaser then clearly things have not gone well. The only thing that was keeping me watching by the time Odo says &#8220;please refrain from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good teaser should make you eager to see the rest of the episode. If, even with my project to watch everything, I very nearly turned the episode off after the teaser then clearly things have not gone well.</p>

<p>The only thing that was keeping me watching by the time Odo says &#8220;please refrain from using your imagination&#8221; was the alternate-Dax, and poor old Bashir&#8217;s fantasies made into the best awkward moment Star Trek has managed. The other &#8216;imagination&#8217; creatures are dull or annoying, missing out on a chance to tell us something about the other characters on the show.</p>

<p>Great Star Trek moment: this episode is the origin story for Sisko&#8217;s baseball, which will play in quite a few future episodes.</p>

<p>272 down, 465 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-272-if-wishes-were-horses-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 271: Suspicions (TNG)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-271-suspicions-tng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-271-suspicions-tng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some helpful advice for any writers considering using narration of any type for TV or movies: don&#8217;t. It has never, ever worked. It certainly doesn&#8217;t work here. I have similar remarks for people who want to use framing scenes and tell their story almost entirely in flashback. There isn&#8217;t a lot to like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some helpful advice for any writers considering using narration of any type for TV or movies: don&#8217;t. It has never, ever worked. It certainly doesn&#8217;t work here. I have similar remarks for people who want to use framing scenes and tell their story almost entirely in flashback.</p>

<p>There isn&#8217;t a lot to like here, even discounting for the inept framing. The other scientists have no existence other than broad caricatures. The pace of the plot is positively soporific. And then we have some very long technobabble sequences towards the resolution of the plot. Blurk. Worst in ages.</p>

<p>271 down, 466 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-271-suspicions-tng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trekathon 270: Progress (DS9)</title>
		<link>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-270-progress-ds9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-270-progress-ds9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trekathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far Deep Space 9 is painting a puzzling picture of Bajoran society. So far we&#8217;ve seen terrorists, farmers and priests. Not exactly the kind of rounded picture you&#8217;d expect from a society being considered for admission into the Federation. Anyway, this week we have the ex-terrorist (Kira) facing off against the stubborn farmer who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far Deep Space 9 is painting a puzzling picture of Bajoran society. So far we&#8217;ve seen terrorists, farmers and priests. Not exactly the kind of rounded picture you&#8217;d expect from a society being considered for admission into the Federation.</p>

<p>Anyway, this week we have the ex-terrorist (Kira) facing off against the stubborn farmer who won&#8217;t leave their land. It&#8217;s an old archetype, but it didn&#8217;t work for me because we haven&#8217;t been given this sense of conflict in Bajoran society so far &#8211; we&#8217;ve <em>only</em> seen the farmers really, so where are all these people who want the progress that this old man is standing in the way of?</p>

<p>Kira was a bit quick to drop everything, but it speaks to the depth of her unresolved conflicts from the occupation. And Sisko is once again just a bit too eager to ignore the violations of the rules and let people get away with anything. Bottom line, another episode that misses out on great because it just didn&#8217;t try hard enough.</p>

<p>(I did enjoy the brief Jake/Nog as traders subplot, though. Nog continues to be the character getting the most development in the show).</p>

<p>270 down, 467 to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exasperatedcalculator.com/archives/2010/06/trekathon-270-progress-ds9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

